Noem and Sutton a historically rural matchup

IMG_0360The 2018 gubernatorial election has had a noticeably rural feel. Candidates Kristi Noem, Billie Sutton and Marty Jackley have all emphasized their farm and ranch backgrounds.

This blog previously noted that, with Noem and Sutton as the major party nominees, South Dakota is virtually guaranteed to elect its first farmer/rancher as governor since Archie Gubbrud in 1960 and 1962. That observation leads to another question: How “rural” is this election matchup, compared to history?

There’s not a perfect and obvious way to measure that, but this blog settled on a simple method. For each gubernatorial election since 1889, look at the home county of each party’s nominee, and look at the population of those counties at the time, based on the most recent census data. Smaller county populations generally equate to a more rural area.

Using this system, one discovers that the Noem-Sutton matchup is the most rural in the history of the state.

Not surprisingly, any election involving a Minnehaha County native is at the very bottom of the list. Even then, the rural nature of the Noem-Sutton contest is striking. Not only is it the most rural in state history, there really aren’t any other recent elections that are even close – the closest are Kneip-Farrar in 1970 and Janklow-McKellips in 1978.

The “least rural” election was only eight years ago, when nominees Dennis Daugaard and Scott Heidepriem both ran from Minnehaha County. Of course, that matchup again shows the imperfection of this method; Daugaard grew up on a farm near Dell Rapids and still lived there, while Heidepriem had moved to Sioux Falls after spending much of his life in Miller. Both, though, were certainly in the greater Sioux Falls orbit at the time of the candidacies.

The data is below:

Year
Republican nominee
County
Population
Democratic nominee*
County
Population
Cumulative Population
2018
Kristi Noem
Hamlin
5,903
Billie Sutton
Gregory
4,271
10,174
1944
M. Q. Sharpe
Lyman
5,045
Lynn Fellows
Aurora
5,387
10,432
1892
Charles Sheldon
Day
9,168
Peter Couchman
Walworth
2,153
11,321
1889
Arthur Mellette
Codington
7,037**
P. F. McClure
Hughes
5,044**
12,081
1908
Robert Vessey
Jerauld
2,798
Andrew E. Lee
Clay
9,316
12,114
1970
Frank Farrar
Marshall
5,965
Dick Kneip
McCook
7,246
13,211
1906
Coe Crawford
Beadle
8,081
John A. Stransky
Brule
5,401
13,482
1932
Warren E. Green
Hamlin
8,299
Tom Berry
Mellette
5,293
13,592
1936
Leslie Jensen
Fall River
8,741
Tom Berry
Mellette
5,293
14,034
1894
Charles Sheldon
Day
9,168
James A. Ward
Hughes
5,044
14,212
1914
Frank Byrne
Faulk
6,716
James W. McCarter
Edmunds
7,654
14,370
1902
Charles Herreid
McPherson
6,327
John W. Martin
Codington
8,770
15,097
1890
Arthur Mellette
Codington
7,037
Maris Taylor
Beadle
9,586
16,623
1896
Amund O. Ringsrud
Union
9,168
Andrew E. Lee
Clay
7,509
16,677
1948
George T. Mickelson
Walworth
7,274
Harold J. Volz
Tripp
9,937
17,211
1978
Bill Janklow
Moody
7,622
Roger McKellips
Union
9,643
17,265
1910
Robert Vessey
Jerauld
5,120
Chauncey L. Wood
Pennington
12,453
17,573
1938
Harlan Bushfield
Hand
9,485
Oscar Fosheim
Miner
8,376
17,861
1904
Samuel Elrod
Clark
6,942
Louis Napoleon Crill
Union
11,153
18,095
1942
M. Q. Sharpe
Lyman
5,045
Lewis W. Bicknell
Day
13,565
18,610
1898
Kirk G. Phillips
Lawrence
11,673
Andrew E. Lee
Clay
7,509
19,182
1928
Buell F. Jones
Marshall
9,596
W. J. Bulow
Union
11,099
20,695
1940
Harlan Bushfield
Hand
7,166
Lewis W. Bicknell
Day
13,565
20,731
1912
Frank Byrne
Faulk
6,716
Edwin S. Johnson
Charles Mix
14,899
21,615
1972
Carv Thompson
Meade
16,618
Dick Kneip
McCook
7,246
23,864
1924
Carl Gunderson
Davison
14,139
W. J. Bulow
Union
11,099
25,238
1926
Carl Gunderson
Davison
14,139
W. J. Bulow
Union
11,099
25,238
1922
William McMaster
Yankton
15,233
Louis Napoleon Crill
Union
11,099
26,332
1946
George T. Mickelson
Walworth
7,274
Richard Haeder
Beadle
19,648
26,922
1916
Peter Norbeck
Spink
15,981
Orville V. Rinehart
Pennington
12,453
28,434
1950
Sigurd Anderson
Day
12,294
Joe Robbie
Davison
16,522
28,816
2002
Mike Rounds
Hughes
16,481
Jim Abbott
Clay
13,537
30,018
1918
Peter Norbeck
Spink
15,981
James E. Bird
Codington
14,092
30,073
1900
Charles Herreid
McPherson
6,327
Burre Lien
Minnehaha
23,926
30,253
1920
William McMaster
Yankton
15,233
William W. Howes
Beadle
19,273
34,506
1934
William C. Allen
Brown
31,458
Tom Berry
Mellette
5,293
36,751
1968
Frank Farrar
Marshall
6,663
Robert Chamberlin
Brown
34,106
40,769
1958
Phil Saunders
Grant
10,233
Ralph Herseth
Brown
32,617
42,850
1960
Archie Gubbrud
Lincoln
12,371
Ralph Herseth
Brown
34,106
46,477
1962
Archie Gubbrud
Lincoln
12,371
Ralph Herseth
Brown
34,106
46,477
1990
George S. Mickelson
Brookings
25,207
Bob Samuelson
Meade
21,878
47,085
1930
Warren E. Green
Hamlin
8,299
David A. McCullough
Minnehaha
50,872
59,171
1986
George S. Mickelson
Brookings
24,332
Lars Herseth
Brown
36,962
61,294
1954
Joe Foss
Minnehaha
70,910
Ed C. Martin
Buffalo
1,615
72,525
1952
Sigurd Anderson
Day
12,294
Sherman Iverson
Minnehaha
70,910
83,204
1964
Nils Boe
Minnehaha
86,575
John Lindley
Brule
6,319
92,894
1974
John Olson
Minnehaha
95,209
Dick Kneip
McCook
7,246
102,455
1956
Joe Foss
Minnehaha
70,910
Ralph Herseth
Brown
32,617
103,527
1982
Bill Janklow
Moody
6,692
Mike O’Connor
Minnehaha
109,435
116,127
1966
Nils Boe
Minnehaha
86,575
Robert Chamberlin
Brown
34,106
120,681
1994
Bill Janklow
Minnehaha
123,809
Jim Beddow
Davison
17,503
141,312
1998
Bill Janklow
Minnehaha
123,809
Bernie Hunhoff
Yankton
19,252
143,061
2006
Mike Rounds
Hughes
16,481
Jack Billion
Minnehaha
148,281
164,762
2014
Dennis Daugaard
Minnehaha
169,468
Susan Wismer
Marshall
4,656
174,124
2010
Dennis Daugaard
Minnehaha
169,468
Scott Heidepriem
Minnehaha
169,468
338,936

The Democratic column includes the Populist-Democratic “fusion” tickets for 1896, 1898 and 1900. This analysis omits third party and independent candidates, even in those instances where the third party candidate finished ahead of one of the major party nominees.

** For 1889, county populations were calculated using the 1890 census, rather than the 1880 census. This was done to account for the dramatic settlement that occurred in Dakota Territory, and then South Dakota, between 1880 and 1890. For example, Hughes County had only 268 residents in 1880, but 5,044 in 1890. The 1890 census numbers are likely much closer to the reality of 1889. Had 1880 census numbers been used, the 1889 Mellette-McClure election would have been “more rural” than Noem-Sutton.